
Meme


Knowing that you have to solve some of the world’s most challenging problems in a mere 12 hours can be intimidating. So, here are some tips to dazzle committee and your chairs with well-researched information and snappy dialogue.
1. Make a list of points that affect your country
It can be quite overwhelming to have the pressure of an entire country’s problems riding on your Dolce & Gabbana jacketed shoulders. So, de-construct your argument and break down the 50-page long study guide you were sent, into a list of the most important issues pertaining to your country. This is bound to boost your confidence, and you also show everyone that you know what you’re talking about!
2. Focus on one point at a time, when speaking and with paperwork
Over the course of committee, many ideas and solutions are brought up. The topics being discussed are vast, therefore addressing individual points at a time may be challenging, but it makes your speech or paperwork way more effective! Isn’t it nicer to listen to a speech that is well-thought out and structured? Focusing on an individual matter gives you more confidence and a feeling that you know what you’re talking about, which helps untie the uncomfortable knot in your stomach when you speak. Articulating your arguments also makes you sound smarter :p
By Alina Vaidya Mahadevan
We all know that working on weekends can be tough. Here are some memes to cheer you up!









India has always been incredibly diverse in terms of race, religion, and culture. India has a lot of minority groups, one of them being Muslims (who make up 14.2% of Indian population.) Most Muslims haven’t had an easy life living in India. They have been discriminated since partition in 1947. In fact, during the battle for independence, Mohammad Ali Jinnah (leader of the Muslim League) actually thought of India as “two nations”- the Hindus and the Muslims. So much so, that he feared that his coreligionists would be permanent minorities in a Hindu dominated country.
Muslims have suffered in India throughout history because of media, some of our past ruling parties, and Hindu-Muslims disputes.
Islamophobia in the media refers to the occurrence or perception that media outlets tend to cover Muslims or Islam-related topics in a negative light. In a lot of articles/ videos, the Indian media tries to link Muslims with crime. Attempts are being made to create fear, hatred, and prejudice against Islam. For example, in the beginning of 2018, there was an attack on a school bus in Gurgaon. The attack was widely condemned in India. Muslims were dragged into this, because those spreading Islamophobia were up to their usual antics. A couple of anti-Muslim people started spreading a message, which blamed 3 Muslims for the attack (without any evidence whatsoever.) Because of this, those Muslims were held responsible for something they didn’t do, even after the police clarified that no members of the Muslim community had anything to do with the event. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egcn8yYPZ4A)
Many social scientists feel that a lot of the acts of violence against Muslims are institutionally supported, particularly by political parties and organizations. In particular, scholars fault the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Shiv Sena for complicity in these incidents, and of using violence against Muslims as a part of a larger electoral strategy. For example, researches done by Michael Biggs (an Associate Professor in Sociology) and Raheel Dhattiwala (an author, who writes about ethnic violence, specifically the Hindu-Muslim violence in India have stated that killings are far higher in areas where the BJP faces stiff electoral opposition than in areas in which it is already strong. In 1989, the north of India saw an increase in orchestrated attacks on Muslims, and the BJP had further success in the local and state elections.
There has also been violence against Muslims. There have been several instances of religious violence against Muslims since Partition of India in 1947, frequently in the form of violent attacks Muslims by Hindu mobs that form a pattern of communal violence between the majority Hindu and minority Muslim communities. Over 10,000 people have been killed in Hindu-Muslim communal violence since 1950 in 6,933 instances of communal violence between 1954 and 1982.
Religious minority groups are amongst those who encounter severe exclusion, discrimination and oppression. In case of Indian-Muslims as a religious marginalized community, these two concepts overlap. However, concern with ‘marginalization’ is relatively recent, and it is crucial to check the development on the marginalized groups. As considerable evidence exists, the process of ‘marginalization’ of minority communities exists in almost all societies and nothing shows that the same is not true of Muslims in India to a greater or a lesser degree.
None of this is justified. Muslims, or any other group for that matter, shouldn’t be oppressed because of their religion. However, one could say that Muslims are discriminated only to a certain extent. It must be considered that the Indian prejudice against Islam is not absolute. If there was 100% Islamophobia in India, then there wouldn’t have been a Muslim President of India – Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam – in the past. A lot of our famous Bollywood actors (such as Shahrukh Khan, Aamir Khan, etc.) who are Muslims wouldn’t be apart of the Indian film industry. Yes, there have been numerous instances of violence and discrimination against Muslims in the recent past, but it is also important to take into account the cultural and political importances the Muslim community has held in India.
A lot of ways to combat this have been tried in the past, but not all of them have been successful. As educated individuals, we can teach the coming generations about Islamophobia, and how it is unfair and unjust to oppress an entire group of people just because of the beliefs of others. Another way to combat this would be to remind people that India is a secular nation, which means that we aren’t connected with religious or spiritual matters. This is important to remember, because it reminds us of what we truly believe, and what we should continue believing to make India, and the world a better place.
Which famous American figurehead should YOU live the American dream with?
Take the totally accurate, a 100% loved, life-changing quiz here!
Word Search
Bored in committee… here’s a small breather!
FIND ALL 6 WORDS!!
| J | C | C | I | X | C | V | U |
| O | S | D | K | H | V | N | E |
| L | H | T | S | C | I | F | D |
| K | P | L | Y | S | A | U | P |
| S | A | N | M | O | E | G | H |
| Q | L | B | A | E | I | R | K |
| P | E | R | Y | T | P | S | P |
| W | R | R | A | M | U | N | L |
Find all 6 words
Answers: Press, UNiS, MUN, JCC, HSC, SC
… 44 Indian Central Reserve Police Officers. 3 Pakistani civilians. 1 suicide bomber. Several heartbroken families. Is all this bloodshed a battle for peace, or a display of suppressed hatred?
This year, the Security Council began with a “BANG!”. Anshul dropping his bottle on to the hard, wooden floor. This outward expression of excitement starkly contrasted by the dull and monotonous general speakers list that then followed. The topic of committee being the recent Pulwama attacks that took place in Kashmir.
On the 14th of February, 2019, a vehicle full of explosives entered the Jammu-Srinagar highway. It passed a bus full of CRPF officers, and exploded. The bus erupted, killing every single officer inside it. The bus behind it was also impacted. 39 officers from the first bus were killed, along with one from the second bus. In retaliation, India conducted air strikes on a large Jaish-E-Muhammad terrorist training camp. This is the jihadist terrorist organization that took responsibility for the attack, releasing a video of the suicide bomber as well.
The delegate of The People’s Republic of China introduced the death toll in both Pakistan and India, emphasizing that innocents in Pakistan were killed. This included 3 innocent Pakistani citizens who were murdered by the Indian air force. The question then arose, Is India facing absolutely no consequences for their air force, that murdered 3 civilians because they were “protecting” themselves?
This heated topic regarding the casualties on both sides , sparked debate with India, Pakistan and all their allies. The CRPF officers in India were murdered by a bomber that was located in Pakistan, but it was not affiliated with the Pakistani government. Whereas, the Indian Air Force violated Pakistan’s airspace and also killed 3 individuals. As a response to the three killings, The United Kingdom, China and the United States all switched from reprimanding Pakistan and wanting to impose sanctions on them to wanting to impose sanctions on India instead. In contrast to this, countries like Japan, Armenia and India itself all stated that the killings were a form of self defence. These countries responded to the previous allegations of India being a “Murderer” by stating that it was Pakistan that first killed 40 CPRF officers. Their point was then quickly refuted as it was not the Pakistani government who killed the 40 CPRF officers in the Pulwama attacks, but instead a radical terrorist group that happened to be from Pakistan.
USA, the largest country present was represented by the smallest guy in the room. A “certain amount of gunfire” was reported at the Indo- Pak border in Kashmir. Non State Actors were eventually held responsible for the crossfire while the Pakistani Military has denied any part in the action. The militants were armed with modern, technologically advanced weapons which are known to be supplied by the USA. Sources are not sure whether the Government of Pakistan is involved in the potentially tragic cross- border fire or the supply of arms and ammunition. However, no casualties have been reported on either side of the border as of now.
Although committee did not start with a bang, it certainly ended with one, the sound of the hollow gunshot that killed the India pilot, Abhinandan Vardhaman. The news released just before committee broke for lunch ,sparking uproar throughout the committee. Now we have to wait and see. How will the countries deal with this new update, how will people react and what steps will the countries take to avert full out war?
Aditi Marshan – Head of Press
This Press veteran has become the epitome of wonder in the newsroom. Her endless enthusiasm to write everything from text messages to poetry coupled with her timid wildness in Press conferences makes her the most approachable, helpful Head ever. The typical hour spent with Aditi involves her obsessing over Ms Smriti and her latest read, a melodramatic narration of her university life to-be, and random Spanish phrases being thrown around. (Yes, we know this sounds a lot like Aria – they’re terrifyingly similar) In essence, she’s forever altered the course of Press at UNiS – the newsroom will always be here to welcome her home.
Pro tip: Since she eats less than a mouse, woo her with a John Donne-type poem instead.

Aria Panchal – Head of Press
Watch this Press Head waltz and salsa across the Press room, adding a metaphor here and a pun there, polishing up every article till it’s perfect. This Press team member starts every joke she has to tell with “You wanna laugh?” The expert titler, Aria is always the one to approach if you can’t think of a name for your article or story or poem.
Pro-tip: Un-funny jokes, waffles with chocolate sauce, and stealing gum-pads for her are the way to this Head of Press’s heart.

Bhakti Almoula – Editor
Widely known as “the sweetest fluff to exist”, this Press member is your go-to for when you need help with literally anything. Seriously – her talents are so vast, as is her desire to help, that she will never say no. Eternally eager to edit the next article and come up with the next idea, Bhakti is the glue holding the Press team together.

Tanisha Luthria – Editor
Describing Tans in one word is surprisingly easy – wild. This JB turned BIS editor is the literal embodiment of chaos and the calm. Not only does she light up the Press room with her infectious sunshine smile, Tanisha brings with her a multitude of fresh ideas. Chat with her about anything from songs to school to driving (!!) and you’re guaranteed to experience her distinctive hair flip.
Pro tip: Habla consigo en Espanol para puntos de brownies 🙂

The Pulwama Crisis
India:
India has taken up a more aggressive stand on the issue. They are ready to take, “Any action necessary” and have stated that their top priority is to bring Abhinandan Vardhaman back to India. Ironically, they sent him to Pakistan in the first place…
Pakistan:
Pakistan has branded themselves as, “a peace loving nation” (clearly true) and want India to be reprimanded for their actions. They believe that they have been made a victim to India’s constant aggression and that this same unprovoked aggression should be controlled.
The United States:
The United States want the Indian pilot, Abhinandan, to be returned back to Indian soil and would criticize Pakistan for violating The Geneva Convention and holding or torturing the militant. Rich coming from a country thats President has just labelled that very same convention as, “The problem”.
The United Kingdom:
The United Kingdom has condemned the “senseless” Pulwama attack and is ready to implement tariffs on Pakistan if they don’t allow Abhinandan to leave. One could almost say that they want the pilot to be able to leave Pakistan just as much as they now want to leave the European Union.
Russia:
Russia too, actively support India and believes the conflict boils down to merely a sovereignty matter. This being a result of the vast amount of knowledge they have about violating countries sovereignty, of course, the most recent learning experience being the violation of Ukranian sovereignty in 2018.
Bangladesh:
Bangladesh strongly support India due to strained relations with Pakistan and are willing to launch an attack if necessary. This, of course, requiring them to traverse the entirety of India in order to reach their fellow islamic foes.
The People’s Republic of China:
The People’s Republic of China stated that they are a pakistani ally and have requested both countries to de escalate tensions, just like they are doing with the current USA – China trade tensions.
Saudi Arabia:
Saudi Arabia has stated that they are ally of Pakistan and believe that India are in the wrong, having approximately the same amount of involvement in committee as they did in The Spanish Civil War.
UAE:
The United Arab Emirates have suggested a bilateral resolution between the two countries and believe the two should resolve the conflict by themselves, as this strategy has worked so well in previous years… They have sided with India, believing peace should be the outcome.
Armenia:
Armenia, being a distant country, has taken a seemingly distant stand on the topic, stating merely that they,”Would side with India if completely necessary”
Japan:
Japan has stated that they maintain good relationships with both countries but have chosen to side with India regarding this conflict. This statement was, of course, immaculately edited and scripted, only to be promptly read out off of a paper to the rest of the committee in a dull tone.
Egypt:
Egypt merely stated that they do not wish to jeopardize their relations with India and have therefore chosen to remain neutral. This short statement being approximately the amount that the delegates of Egypt have spoken in the entirety of committee.
Iran:
Iran too has stated that they have fairly good ties with both countries but have reprimanded both countries for escalating tensions. They want India to stop being an “occupation force in Kashmir” and propose that Kashmir is allowed to take a referendum. Here’s to hoping we do not receive a Bregret 2.0….
Germany:
Germany has taken a fairly idealistic stand, wanting to resolve the dispute via diplomatic talks as well as wanting India and Pakistan to take into consideration the opinions and feelings of the Kashmiri people. This coming from the nation who committed one of the world’s worst atrocities and largest genocides known to man.
Afghanistan:
Although Afghanistan is an islamic country, due to strained relations between them and Pakistan, they choose to side with India. They have also sentimentally sent their condolences to the families of soldiers that have lost their lives.